Internationaler Protest gegen freiwillige Vorratsdatenspeicherung in der EU

Die Verhandlungen über das Telekom-Paket in der EU brummen bereits wieder, am Donnerstag gibt es ein Treffen zwischen Kommission, Rat und Parlament, unter anderem dazu (S. 20, Paragraf 6a). Hier in Deutschland plant ja Wolfgang Schäuble gerade etwas ähnliches. Wir haben uns daher mal wieder international zusammengetan und eine gemeinsame Presseerklärung herausgegeben. Bitte helft dabei, diese Information zu verbreiten, ruft eure EU-Abgeordneten an und schaut euch weitere Möglichkeiten zur Mithilfe im Wiki von La Quadrature du Net an.

Update: Die deutsche und französische Version sind jetzt auch verfügbar.

Press release by La Quadrature du Net, European Digital Rights (EDRi), Working Group on Data Retention (AK Vorrat), and, 2009-01-28:

EU proposal puts confidential communications data at risk

Civil liberties groups La Quadrature du Net, European Digital Rights (EDRi), AK Vorrat and are urging the European Parliament to heed advice given by the European Data Protection Supervisor Peter Hustinx and scrap plans dubbed „voluntary data retention“.

„A proposal currently discussed in the European Parliament as part of the ‚telecom package‘ would allow providers to collect a potentially unlimited amount of sensitive, confidential communications data including our telephone and e-mail contacts, the geographic position of our mobile phones and the websites we visit on the Internet“, warns Patrick Breyer of German privacy watchdog AK Vorrat. „Apart from the creation of vast data pools that could go far beyond what is being collected under the directive on data retention, the proposal would also permit the passing on of traffic data to other companies for ’security purposes‘. We must not let a potentially unlimited amount of confidential data be exposed to risks of disclosure or abuse in this way.“

„This proposal is lobbied for under the guise of ’security‘, but what it really means is that users and citizens would have no expectation of privacy on the Internet anymore,“ adds Ralf Bendrath from EDRi. „This is a clear breach of the European tradition of considering privacy a fundamental human right.“

In a paper published earlier this month, European Data Protection Supervisor Peter Hustinx joined the critics, warning the proposal would constitute a „risk of abuse“ and „may be interpreted as enabling the collection and processing of traffic data for security purposes for an unspecified period of time.“ Hustinx reached „the conclusion that the best outcome would be for the proposed Article 6.6(a) to be deleted altogether“ – a view firmly shared by La Quadrature du Net, EDRi, and AK Vorrat.

„A few months before the elections, citizens will have the opportunity to see if the Members of European Parliament are willing to protect their privacy“, declares Jérémie Zimmermann, co-founder of the citizen’s initiative La Quadrature du Net. „Every citizen should inform their MEPs and ask them to massively reject this article 6 (6a) of the ePrivacy directive. Other crucial issues about content and network neutrality are at stake as well. We must remind MEPs that they were elected to protect Europeans‘ fundamental rights and freedom rather than abolishing them in favour of particular interests.“

In a letter of September last year, 11 German civil liberties, journalists, lawyers and consumer protection organisations „urgently“ asked the Commission, the Council and Parliament to scrap the proposed article 6 (6a) and „maintain the successful regulation of traffic data“ which they say has „proven to constitute the best guarantee for our safety in information society.“

Background paper by Working Group on Data Retention (AK Vorrat).

3 Ergänzungen

  1. Ist Malware denkbar, die mit dem Anruf übertragen wird und den Provider außer Stand setzt, die Verbindungsdaten zu speichern oder gar zu verwenden (als Drohmöglichkeit, in verschiedenen Formen etc.)?

Dieser Artikel ist älter als ein Jahr, daher sind die Ergänzungen geschlossen.