Smart Technologies und Big Data versprechen umfangreiche und ausgefeilte Veränderungen in Politik, Kultur und Alltag. Das beschreibt der weißrussische Publizist Evgeny Morozov in seinem neuen Buch „To Save Everything, Click Here“. Ein Anwendungsfall ist „Pre-Crime“: Die Generierung von Verdacht, eh überhaupt ein Verbrechen passiert. Nicht nur von Polizeibehörden, sondern auch privaten Firmen.
Das neue Buch gibt’s auf clickherethebook.com:
The temptation of the digital age is to fix everything—from crime to corruption to pollution to obesity—by digitally quantifying, tracking, or gamifying behavior. But when we change the motivations for our moral, ethical, and civic behavior we may also change the very nature of that behavior. Technology can be a force for improvement—but only if we keep solutionism in check and learn to appreciate the imperfections of liberal democracy. Some of those imperfections are not accidental but by design. Arguing that we badly need a new, post-Internet way to debate the moral consequences of digital technologies, To Save Everything, Click Here warns against a world of seamless efficiency, where everyone is forced to wear Silicon Valley’s digital straitjacket.
Einen ersten Auszug gibt es beim Guardian: How Facebook could get you arrested
We don’t know if Facebook has some kind of Paedophile-o-Meter. But, given the extensive user analysis it already does, it probably wouldn’t be very hard to build one –and not just for scoring paedophiles. What about Drug-o-Meter? Or – Joseph McCarthy would love this – Communist-o-Meter? Given enough data and the right algorithms, all of us are bound to look suspicious. What happens, then, when Facebook turns us – before we have committed any crimes – over to the police? Will we, like characters in a Kafka novel, struggle to understand what our crime really is and spend the rest of our lives clearing our names? Will Facebook perhaps also offer us a way to pay a fee to have our reputations restored? What if its algorithms are wrong?
The promise of predictive policing might be real, but so are its dangers. The solutionist impulse needs to be restrained. Police need to subject their algorithms to external scrutiny and address their biases. Social networking sites need to establish clear standards for how much predictive self-policing they’ll actually do and how far they will go in profiling their users and sharing this data with police. While Facebook might be more effective than police in predicting crime, it cannot be allowed to take on these policing functions without also adhering to the same rules and regulations that spell out what police can and cannot do in a democracy. We cannot circumvent legal procedures and subvert democratic norms in the name of efficiency alone.
Evgeny Morozov wird auch auf der re:publica 13 vom 6.-8. Mai in Berlin einen Vortrag halten.
FYI andere reviews / Auszüge
mit interessanten Beispiel Strassenlärm 19Jht Wien in Bezug auf Diskussionführung
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2013/03/to_save_everything_click_here_how_to_vanquish_technological_defeatism.html
Keep Calm and Carry On… Buying
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/10/opinion/sunday/morozov-the-surreal-side-of-endless-information.html
@alexismadrigal The Atlantic
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/03/toward-a-complex-realistic-and-moral-tech-criticism/273996/
‚We are abandoning all the checks and balances‘
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/mar/09/evgeny-morozov-technology-solutionism-interview
Schraubenzieher, Safe & Internetzugang Unterhaltung & Trollkunst (nach Guardian IV)
Evgeny’s little problem
http://www.roughtype.com/?p=3071
Bruce Schneider hat dazu bereits geschrieben:
http://www.schneier.com/essay-114.html (200x) und kürzlich hier:
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/03/16/opinion/schneier-internet-surveillance/index.html