Informationelle-Ökologie

  • : Knowledge Ecology Studies
    Knowledge Ecology Studies

    Knowledge Ecology International (Ehemals CPTech) hat ein neues Open Journal gestartet und die erste Ausgabe ist online: Knowledge Ecology Studies.

    KE Studies is an online publication that focuses on the creation, dissemination and access to knowledge goods. It is a multidisciplinary journal that draws on a number of specialties: sciences, technologies, public policies, the laws of intellectual property, business, free speech and privacy, telecommunications and other related knowledge disciplines.

    10. Juli 2007 1
  • : The privatizing of the cultural commons
    The privatizing of the cultural commons

    Neuer Podcast von AudioBerkman: Lewis Hyde on Cultural Commons.

    Berkman Fellow Lewis Hyde talks about the topic of his upcoming work, “the privatizing of the cultural commons.” Hyde addresses many of the issues and concerns that modern copyright use presents to works traditionally open for public consumption. Referencing the life and work of Ben Franklin, he argues on behalf of the public’s need for access to traditionally public ideas and works for the benefit and progression of society.

    Die MP3 ist ca eine Stunde lang.

    14. Februar 2007
  • : NetzpolitikTV: Das Interview mit Lawrence Lessig bei Google Video
    NetzpolitikTV: Das Interview mit Lawrence Lessig bei Google Video

    Hier ist das komplette NetzpolitikTV-Interview mit Lawrence Lessig im komfortablen Player-Format zum sofort im hier und Netz anschauen, ohne die Dateien herunter laden zu müssen. Die einzelnen Dateien stehen hier auch einzeln zum Download zur Verfügung. Nachdem meine Versuche gescheitert sind, OGG Theora Files bei Sevenload hochzuladen, hab ich diese nun bei Google Video geparkt. Die Plattform ist mir eigentlich auch sympathischer, da sie zugleich Downloads im OGG-Format anbietet und über eine Fullscreen-Option verfügt.

    23. November 2006 6
  • : Capitalism 3.0: A Guide to Reclaiming the Commons
    Capitalism 3.0: A Guide to Reclaiming the Commons

    Von Peter Barnes ist das Buch „Capitalism 3.0: A Guide to Reclaiming the Commons“ (PDF) erschienen. Das Buch wurde auch unter einer Creative Commons Lizenz veröffentlicht. Peter Barne ist im Moment auch Gastblogger im „On the Commons“-Blog und hat dort schonmal ausführlich über „Capitalism 3.0″ geschrieben.

    Hier ist der Teaser des Verlages:

    In Capitalism 3.0, Peter Barnes redefines the debate about the costs and benefits of the operating system known as the free market. Despite clunky features, early versions of capitalism were somewhat successful. The current model, however, is packed with proprietary features that benefit a lucky few while threatening to crash the system for everyone else. Far from being „free,“ the market is accessible only to huge corporations that reap the benefits while passing the costs on to the consumer. Barnes maps out a better way. Drawn from his own career as a highly successful entrepreneur, the author’s vision of capitalism includes alternatives to the current profit-driven corporate approach, new legal entities, and a more responsible use of markets and property rights. Capitalism 3.0 offers viable solutions to some of the country’s most pressing economic, environmental, and social concerns.

    16. Oktober 2006
  • : Informationelle Ökologie ohne Ökologie?
    Informationelle Ökologie ohne Ökologie?

    Lesenswert ist ein Beitrag von David Bollier im „On the Commons“-Blog: »Can We have an “Environmentalism for the Net” Without an “Environmentalism for the Environment”?

    Years ago, in a much-cited article, Professor James Boyle called for an “environmentalism for the net” – i.e., a mobilization of language and activism to preserve the commons of the Internet. In light of the new books about computer industry abuses of nature and human health, perhaps now it is worth asking if we can have an environmentalism for the net without also pursuing an environmentalism for the environment.

    Er bezieht sich auf den Artikel „Environmentalism for Web 2.0“ von Soenke Zehle im Mute Magazin:

    Happy to describe media cultures in ecological terms, net users may be unaware of the heavy ecological cost of communications networks. But can environmental justice and labour movements learn a trick or two from net culture? Soenke Zehle reviews two recent books, High Tech Trash: Digital Devices, Hidden Toxics, and Human Health and Challenging the Chip: Labor Rights and Environmental Justice in the Global Electronics Industry

    25. September 2006 3
  • : Wos4 – Medienspiegel
    Wos4 – Medienspiegel

    Hier ist mal ein kleiner Medienüberblick über die Wizards of OS 4.

    Viele Bilder finden sich bei Flickr mit dem Tag „WOS4“.

    Eine Blog-Übersicht findet man bei Technoratig und bei Google Blogsearch.

    18. September 2006 1
  • : Frei zum Download: Freie Kultur – Wesen und Zukunft der Kreativität
    Frei zum Download: Freie Kultur – Wesen und Zukunft der Kreativität

    Die deutsche Übersetzung des letzten Werkes von Lawrence Lessig („Free Culture“), „Freie Kultur – Wesen und Zukunft der Kreativität“, ist jetzt vom Münchener Verlag OpenSourcePress unter eine Creative Commons Lizenz gestellt worden. Dies ermöglicht jetzt bequeme Zitate, ohne aus dem Buch abschreiben zu müssen. Allerdings empfehle ich trotzdem den Kauf des Buches – es lohnt sich.

    18. September 2006 1
  • : Access to Knowledge in a Network Society
    Access to Knowledge in a Network Society

    Karsten Gerloff hat seine Masterthesis zum Thema „Access to Knowledge in a Network Society“ fertiggestellt und unter einer CC-Lizenz verfügbar gemacht. Herzlichen Glückwunsch (Jetzt möchte ich aber auch eine Offline-Version davon erhlaten).

    Hier ist der Abstract:

    As the network has become the dominant organising pattern of society, knowledge has taken centre stage in the economy. Having access to knowledge determines who can participate in this informational economy, and on what terms. But knowledge is different from physical goods: it is nonrival and non-exclusive. It is also the input of its own production process: Knowledge builds upon knowledge. A key player in the international system of the regulation of knowledge is the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO). Its approach presently relies mainly on intellectual monopoly powers (often called „intellectual property“). Other models, such as commons-based peer production, are usually not considered.

    After providing an overview over recent work in the field, this thesis examines how access to knowledge is regulated, and what conflicts are caused by this regulation. The debate on a development agenda for WIPO offers a vantage point from which to describe the tensions that exist in the international framework for the regulation of knowledge.

    Looking at the first year of the WIPO debate, it becomes clear that there are two major lines of conflict. One is between developing and developed countries, which often have different understandings of the purpose of IMPs. As a consequence, they prefer different solutions to the problems at hand: while developed countries are looking to create a global system of regulation with uniformly strict standards for intellectual monopolies, developing countries require room for experimentation. The second line of conflict is between rightsholders and the users of knowledge. Rightsholders generally would like to tighten standards, while user groups highlight the importance of access.

    Besides a reform of WIPO, experimentation is needed to find viable and sustainable strategies for governing knowledge. The project of a treaty on access to knowledge provides ideas and offers an opportunity for debate on the way ahead.

    Hier gibts ein 600KB PDF und hier ein 400KB grosses Latex-File.

    21. August 2006 1
  • : A closed mind about an open world
    A closed mind about an open world

    Sehr lesenswert ist die aktuelle Kolumne von James Boyle in der Financial Times: A closed mind about an open world.

    Studying intellectual property and the internet has convinced me that we have another cognitive bias. Call it the openness aversion. We are likely to undervalue the importance, viability and productive power of open systems, open networks and non-proprietary production. Test yourself on the following questions. In each case, it is 1991 and I have removed from you all knowledge of the past 15 years.

    You have to design a global computer network. One group of scientists describes a system that is fundamentally open – open protocols and systems so anyone could connect to it and offer information or products to the world. Another group – scholars, businessmen, bureaucrats – points out the problems. Anyone could connect to it. They could do anything. There would be porn, piracy, viruses and spam. Terrorists could put up videos glorifying themselves. Your activist neighbour could compete with The New York Times in documenting the Iraq war. Better to have a well-managed system, in which official approval is required to put up a site; where only a few actions are permitted; where most of us are merely recipients of information; where spam, viruses, piracy (and innovation and anonymous speech) are impossible. Which would you have picked?

    14. August 2006
  • : Wizards of OS 4 – Information Freedom Rules
    Wizards of OS 4 – Information Freedom Rules

    Volker Grassmuck hat für Telepolis die Themen der kommenden Wizards of OS 4 zusammengefasst: Information Freedom Rules.

    Wir schreiben das Jahr 2006. 15 Jahre nach Start der GNU General Public License, 10 Jahre nachdem John Perry Barlow die Unabhängigkeit des Cyberspace erklärte und 5 Jahre nach Gründung der Wikipedia. Zeit für eine Bestandsaufnahme.

    Freie Protokolle ermöglichen das Internet. Freie Software dominiert auf den Servern. Die Freiheitsbewegung in den Wissenschaften geht mit großen Schritten voran. Die freie, kooperative Online Enzyklopädie Wikipedia ist als Referenz fest etabliert. Und jeden Tag sind es mehr Menschen, die kulturelle Ausdrucksformen jeder Art frei erschaffen und miteinander austauschen.

    Unbedingt vormerken und kommen: „Wizards of OS 4 – Information Freedom Rules“ – 14.-16 September in Berlin.

    7. August 2006 2
  • : Toward an Ecology of Intellectual Property
    Toward an Ecology of Intellectual Property

    Zum Wochenende mal wieder ein schöner wissenschaftlicher Text: „Toward an Ecology of Intellectual Property: Lessons From Environmental Economics for Valuing Copyright’s Commons“ (PDF / 59 Seiten) von Frank Pasquale aus dem „Yale Journal of Law and Technology 78 (2006)“.

    The „fair use“ defense in copyright law shields an intellectual commons of protected uses of copyrighted material from infringement actions. In determining whether a given use is fair, courts must assess the new use’s potential „effect on the market“ for the copyrighted work. Fair use jurisprudence too often fails to address the complementary, network, and long-range effects of new technologies on the value of copyrighted works. These effects parallel the indirect, direct, and option values of biodiversity recently recognized by environmental economists. Their sophisticated methods for valuing natural resources in tangible commons can inform legal efforts to address the intellectual commons’ „effect on the market“ for copyrighted works.

    4. August 2006